[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Cisco v FSF dismissed
From: |
Hadron |
Subject: |
Re: Cisco v FSF dismissed |
Date: |
Thu, 23 Apr 2009 08:24:57 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.0.90 (gnu/linux) |
ray <ray@zianet.com> writes:
> On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 21:00:57 -0500, DFS wrote:
>
>> Rjack wrote:
>>> Yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaawn.
>>>
>>> FSF runs from another opportunity to prove legal enforceability claims
>>> for the GPL. Just as I predicted. Listen for the Freetard spin.
>>>
>>> The Cisco v. Free Software case was dismissed with prejudice and
>>> without award of court costs. (On PACER court record 4/22/2009)
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>> Rjack :)
>>
>>
>>
>> The "Free" software bozos requested "the Court order Defendant to
>> account for and disgorge to Plaintiff all profits derived by Defendant
>> from its unlawful acts;"
>>
>> http://www.fsf.org/licensing/complaint-2008-12-11.pdf
>>
>> LMAO! They sure do sound greedy for a not-for-profit, tax-exampt public
>> charity.
>>
>> It should be unlawful to dump crappy open source code on the market for
>> less than the cost to produce it.
>
> Well DooFuS, one could also argue it should be unlawful to dump
> propietary code on the market for exhorbitant prices.
What did you pay for your fat free milk today Ray?
- Cisco v FSF dismissed, Rjack, 2009/04/22
- Re: Cisco v FSF dismissed, DFS, 2009/04/23
- Re: Cisco v FSF dismissed, amicus_curious, 2009/04/23
- Re: Cisco v FSF dismissed, Ciaran O'Riordan, 2009/04/23
- Message not available
- Re: Cisco v FSF dismissed, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/04/24
- Re: Cisco v FSF dismissed, Ciaran O'Riordan, 2009/04/24
- Message not available
- Re: Cisco v FSF dismissed, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/04/24
- Re: Cisco v FSF dismissed, John Hasler, 2009/04/24
- Re: Cisco v FSF dismissed, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/04/24
- Re: Cisco v FSF dismissed, John Hasler, 2009/04/24
- Re: Cisco v FSF dismissed, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/04/24