[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Cisco v FSF dismissed
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: Cisco v FSF dismissed |
Date: |
Sat, 25 Apr 2009 01:13:34 +0200 |
John Hasler wrote:
>
> Alexander Terekhov writes:
> > Why would Cisco *NOT* consent to the dismissal of a lawsuit against Cisco
> > with prejudice?
>
> Why *WOULD* the plaintiffs consent to the dismissal of a lawsuit against
> Cisco with prejudice?
Because the judge (at first ever GPL lawsuit conference) told Daniel Ben
Ravicher and Aaron Kyle Williamson:
Run out of this court as quick as you can with your incompetent
complaint or face sanctions.
Why not?
regards,
alexander.
--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards
too, whereas GNU cannot.)
- Re: Cisco v FSF dismissed, (continued)
Re: Cisco v FSF dismissed, amicus_curious, 2009/04/23
- Re: Cisco v FSF dismissed, Ciaran O'Riordan, 2009/04/23
- Message not available
- Re: Cisco v FSF dismissed, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/04/24
- Re: Cisco v FSF dismissed, Ciaran O'Riordan, 2009/04/24
- Message not available
- Re: Cisco v FSF dismissed, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/04/24
- Re: Cisco v FSF dismissed, John Hasler, 2009/04/24
- Re: Cisco v FSF dismissed, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/04/24
- Re: Cisco v FSF dismissed, John Hasler, 2009/04/24
- Re: Cisco v FSF dismissed,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: Cisco v FSF dismissed, dr_nikolaus_klepp, 2009/04/28