[PATCH v1 5/6] site: faq: change x86 to AMD64.

[Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli]

From: DiffieHellman <DiffieHellman@endianness.com>

Most people using x86 CPUs use the AMD64 ISA, so people are usually
more interested in 64bit x86 CPUs than 32bit ones.

Signed-off-by: DiffieHellman <DiffieHellman@endianness.com>
GNUtoo: split, commit message, removed 1 useless change.
Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
---
 site/faq.md | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/site/faq.md b/site/faq.md
index 51ba61b..d9da350 100644
--- a/site/faq.md
+++ b/site/faq.md
@@ -507,15 +507,15 @@ issues, although the implementation is wildly different.
 The Platform Security Processor (PSP) is built in on the AMD CPUs whose
 
[architecture](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_AMD_CPU_microarchitectures)
 is Late Family 16h (Puma), Zen 17h or later (and also on
 the AMD GPUs which are GCN 5th gen (Vega) or later). On the CPUs, a PSP
-controls the main x86 core startup. PSP firmware is cryptographically
+controls the main AMD64 core startup. PSP firmware is cryptographically
 signed with a strong key similar to the Intel ME. If the PSP firmware
-is not present, or if the AMD signing key is not present, the x86 cores
+is not present, or if the AMD signing key is not present, the AMD64 cores
 will not be released from reset, rendering the system inoperable.
 
 The PSP is an ARM core with TrustZone technology, built onto the main
 CPU die. As such, it has the ability to hide its own program code,
 scratch RAM, and any data it may have taken and stored from the
-lesser-privileged x86 system RAM (kernel encryption keys, login data,
+lesser-privileged AMD64 system RAM (kernel encryption keys, login data,
 browsing history, keystrokes, who knows!). To make matters worse, the
 PSP theoretically has access to the entire system memory space (AMD
 either will not or cannot deny this, and it would seem to be required to
@@ -593,7 +593,7 @@ shows that something is seriously wrong with AMD. Like 
Intel, they do
 not deserve your money.
 
 Given the current state of Intel hardware with the Management Engine, it
-is our opinion that all performant x86 hardware newer than the AMD
+is our opinion that all performant AMD64 hardware newer than the AMD
 Family 15h CPUs (on AMD's side) or anything post-2009 on Intel's side
 is defective by design and cannot safely be used to store, transmit, or
 process sensitive data. Sensitive data is any data in which a data
-- 
2.41.0