[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gnugo-devel] mixed patch
From: |
Trevor Morris |
Subject: |
Re: [gnugo-devel] mixed patch |
Date: |
Thu, 25 Oct 2001 15:49:15 -0400 |
I intend to include elapsed CPU time per problem in the next html
regression view revision. If there's interest, it should be pretty
easy after that to compare the performance of different GnuGo versions
in total, or per problem. Feedback appreciated.
-Trevor
At 12:35 PM 10/25/2001 -0700, you wrote:
>
>> Both these two changes makes the owl reading become more busy and I
>> think noticably slows down the engine. This is a problem, but at this
>> time I think we can accept this in exchange for strength. We will need
>> to do some performance tuning later and then we can decide whether
>> it's possible to speed up the owl code sufficiently or if we need to
>> turn something off.
>
>We did lose on time to juka on NNGS today. Were you running
>the regressions at that time?
>
>Dan
>
>_______________________________________________
>gnugo-devel mailing list
>address@hidden
>http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnugo-devel
>
- [gnugo-devel] mixed patch, Gunnar Farneback, 2001/10/18
- [gnugo-devel] mixed patch, Gunnar Farneback, 2001/10/25
- Re: [gnugo-devel] mixed patch, Daniel Bump, 2001/10/25
- [gnugo-devel] Thinking on opponent's time?, Trevor Morris, 2001/10/26
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Thinking on opponent's time?, Allan Crossman, 2001/10/26
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Thinking on opponent's time?, Trevor Morris, 2001/10/26
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Thinking on opponent's time?, Dave Denholm, 2001/10/26
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Thinking on opponent's time?, Daniel Bump, 2001/10/26
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Thinking on opponent's time?, Heikki Levanto, 2001/10/26
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Thinking on opponent's time?, Daniel Bump, 2001/10/26