[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gnugo-devel] Re: Stack over-run
From: |
Daniel Bump |
Subject: |
Re: [gnugo-devel] Re: Stack over-run |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Feb 2002 10:05:22 -0800 |
> Sorry, haven't been watching this thread...
>
> if it's only gcc that's giving these warnings, then can
> gcc builds use variadic macros, and then only non-gcc
> will see the alternate formulations of TRACE() ..?
You are correct. Normally gcc builds the variadic
versions and there are no warnings. For testing I
coerced gcc into compiling with the non-variadic
macros by hand editing config.h.
So I have no reason to believe the patch actually causes
warnings on any compiler. I added it to the CVS.
Dan
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Re: Stack over-run, (continued)
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Re: Stack over-run, Daniel Bump, 2002/02/14
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Re: Stack over-run, Daniel Bump, 2002/02/16
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Re: Stack over-run, Trevor Morris, 2002/02/16
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Re: Stack over-run, Daniel Bump, 2002/02/16
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Re: Stack over-run, Gunnar Farneback, 2002/02/16
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Re: Stack over-run, Trevor Morris, 2002/02/16
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Re: Stack over-run, Gunnar Farneback, 2002/02/17
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Re: Stack over-run, Daniel Bump, 2002/02/19
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Re: Stack over-run, Dave Denholm, 2002/02/19
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Re: Stack over-run,
Daniel Bump <=