Re: [gnugo-devel]

[bump]

I wrote:

> > In a sense, alternating between the "slightly unreasonable" and
> > the "slightly conservative" evaluation functions uses the strong
> > points of both :-)
> 
> ... this ``pair go'' approach will certainly complicate regression 
> testing of the patch. (http://www.pairgo.or.jp/home.

Probably the movenum test should be disabled during regressions.

Dan