[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gnugo-devel] opening db proposal
From: |
Arend Bayer |
Subject: |
Re: [gnugo-devel] opening db proposal |
Date: |
Thu, 21 Oct 2004 19:50:04 +0200 (CEST) |
> > +-------------------+
> > |...................|
> > |...................|
> > |...............O...|
> > |...X...............|
> > |...................|
> > |...................|
> > |...................|
> > |...................|
> > |...................|
> > |...................|
> > |...................|
> > |...................|
> > |...................|
> > |...................|
> > |..*................|
> > |...X...........O...|
> > |...................|
> > |...................|
> > |...................|
> > +-------------------+
> >
> >
> >
> > +-------------------+
> > |...................|
> > |...................|
> > |...*...............|
> > |...X.....X.....X...|
> > |...................|
> > |...................|
> > |...................|
> > |...................|
> > |...................|
> > |...................|
> > |...................|
> > |...................|
> > |...................|
> > |...................|
> > |...................|
> > |...O...........O...|
> > |...................|
> > |...................|
> > |...................|
> > +-------------------+
> >
> >
> > Unfortunately, both of those moves did substantially _better_ than the
> > alternatives. Since all the players in this set are far stronger than me,
> > I'm not really qualified to comment.
>
> Both these are non-standard.
And bad, too. What was the minimum strength of players you used?
Arend