[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gnugo-devel] pattern questions
From: |
alain Baeckeroot |
Subject: |
Re: [gnugo-devel] pattern questions |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Nov 2006 10:55:41 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.3 |
Le mardi 28 novembre 2006 20:49, Gunnar Farneb�ck a écrit :
> Alain wrote:
> > In regression test nngs:308 , gg3.7.10 wants M9 which is 1 point
> > gote. There are other much better moves (nearly 6 pts gote, 2 gote,
> > 1 sente)
>
> Actually M9 is reverse sente but indeed there are better moves.
[...]
>
> Sente13 is a reverse sente pattern, which is perfectly appropriate.
>
Maybe it should be renamed RevSente13 ?
> > Q3/ its not a question: the choice of the move is made during the
> > second pass of endgame stuff, so it is probably another problem to
> > fix.
>
> Indeed. The endgame database adds this match:
>
> pattern 'CF3'+0 matched at M9
> ...followup value 12.25
>
> which incorrectly claims that the pattern is sente. Together with the
> reverse sente found by Sente13 this move is considered double sente
> and thus valued very high. Interestingly there's an old comment by me
> in endgame.db that CF3 is redundant. Try to just remove it and see
> what happens.
I just commented out CF3 pattern, and now the test PASS.
i ll put regression result and patch in a TRAC-ticket soon
Alain