[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [URI design]: query-string vs PATH_INFO
From: |
Davi Leal |
Subject: |
Re: [URI design]: query-string vs PATH_INFO |
Date: |
Tue, 30 Oct 2007 17:28:13 +0100 (CET) |
MJ Ray wrote:
> You can see other sites developed to use URIs where appropriate at
> places like Amazon or many other OSCommerce sites.
>
> > IMHO it would be a mistake use PATH_INFO based URIs in our webapp.
>
> That's an overreaction. It would be a mistake to use it everywhere,
> but it would also be a mistake to use QUERY_STRING everywhere.
IMHO the current URI design has done it rightly, not too much PATH_INFO
and not too much QUERY_STRING. Adding more PATH_INFO cases will raise
more problems than good; besides it would be a lot of work to not benefit.
- Re: Microformats and logical URLs -- mod_rewrite, Victor Engmark, 2007/10/24
- Re: [URI design]: query-string vs PATH_INFO -- mod_rewrite, Davi Leal, 2007/10/24
- Re: [URI design]: query-string vs PATH_INFO -- mod_rewrite, MJ Ray, 2007/10/29
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Fwd: [URI design]: query-string vs PATH_INFO -- mod_rewrite, Victor Engmark, 2007/10/29
- Re: [URI design]: query-string vs PATH_INFO -- mod_rewrite, Davi Leal, 2007/10/29
- Re: [URI design]: query-string vs PATH_INFO -- mod_rewrite, MJ Ray, 2007/10/29
- Re: License to use, Davi Leal, 2007/10/30
- Re: License to use, MJ Ray, 2007/10/30
- Re: Licenses -- webapp users protection, Davi Leal, 2007/10/30
- Re: [URI design]: query-string vs PATH_INFO,
Davi Leal <=