Re: GNU Herds vs RMS/FSF -- hosting

[Davi Leal]

Dave Crossland wrote:
> >  Note GNU Herds has added along the passed years several control,
> >  restrictions, etc. exposed by RMS
> >  I think they do not like the association part of GNU Herds.
> >  What about the GNU Herds hosting? Does GNU Herds need to be 100%
> >  independent?
>
> I thought the control exerted by RMS was unrelated to the FSF hosting?

After thinking a little, IMHO we can follow using the FSF hosting up to there 
is any problem?

The FSF hosting seems to be working well.