[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNU Herds vs RMS/FSF -- hosting
From: |
Dave Crossland |
Subject: |
Re: GNU Herds vs RMS/FSF -- hosting |
Date: |
Sat, 12 Apr 2008 01:02:15 +0100 |
On 11/04/2008, Davi Leal <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > I thought the control exerted by RMS was unrelated to the FSF hosting?
>
> After thinking a little, IMHO we can follow using the FSF hosting up to there
> is any problem? The FSF hosting seems to be working well.
I agree :-)
--
Regards,
Dave
- Re: GNU Herds vs RMS/FSF, (continued)
- Re: GNU Herds vs RMS/FSF, Dave Crossland, 2008/04/11
- Re: GNU Herds vs RMS/FSF -- joining both, Davi Leal, 2008/04/11
- Re: GNU Herds vs RMS/FSF -- joining both, Dave Crossland, 2008/04/11
- Re: GNU Herds vs RMS/FSF -- joining both, Davi Leal, 2008/04/12
- Re: GNU Herds vs RMS/FSF -- joining both, Davi Leal, 2008/04/30
- Re: GNU Herds vs RMS/FSF -- hosting, Davi Leal, 2008/04/11
- Re: GNU Herds vs RMS/FSF -- hosting,
Dave Crossland <=
- Re: GNU Herds vs RMS/FSF -- User's freedom, Davi Leal, 2008/04/11
- Re: GNU Herds vs RMS/FSF -- User's freedom, Karl Goetz, 2008/04/11
- Re: GNU Herds vs RMS/FSF -- User's freedom, Dave Crossland, 2008/04/11
- Re: GNU Herds vs RMS/FSF -- marketing, Davi Leal, 2008/04/11
- Re: GNU Herds vs RMS/FSF -- marketing, Dave Crossland, 2008/04/11