Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Gnumed-devel digest, Vol 1 #279 - 5 msgs

[Horst Herb]

On Mon, 8 Apr 2002 21:44, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
> In a sense v_basic_address might be considered
> v_primary_address, no ? Thus the address type would be "home"
> (or should this rather be "primary" in the first place ?).
>
> After all, _basic_ should have some meaning with respect to
> simplification beyond mere denormalization, shouldn't it ?
>
> Unreasonable ?

Not unreasonable. But "basic address" was meant to be a view for the basic 
properties of *any* address. For the home/primary address, we should 
design another view.

Horst