[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Gnumed-devel digest, Vol 1 #279 - 5 msgs

From: Horst Herb
Subject: Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Gnumed-devel digest, Vol 1 #279 - 5 msgs
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2002 22:31:10 +1000

On Mon, 8 Apr 2002 21:44, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
> In a sense v_basic_address might be considered
> v_primary_address, no ? Thus the address type would be "home"
> (or should this rather be "primary" in the first place ?).
> After all, _basic_ should have some meaning with respect to
> simplification beyond mere denormalization, shouldn't it ?
> Unreasonable ?

Not unreasonable. But "basic address" was meant to be a view for the basic 
properties of *any* address. For the home/primary address, we should 
design another view.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]