[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnumed-devel] state of gnumed?
From: |
Horst Herb |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnumed-devel] state of gnumed? |
Date: |
Fri, 30 Aug 2002 17:47:29 +1000 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.4.6 |
On Fri, 30 Aug 2002 04:14 am, David Cameron wrote:
> I'm a little unclear though as to how far along the development really is.
> I realize switching from a monolithic database to several distributed
> services probably set the project back quite a bit. But looking around the
> latest CVS version of the client code, it doesn't seem like the client
> communicates to the server at all. Is this accurate?
Prior versions did communicate with the backend. Then we revamped the GUI,
which was mainly done by Richard in a hhuge one man effort - and as he had no
previous experience with Python, he simply left all the backend related stuff
out. I was supposed to fix that, but had no time since I just bought a
practice, which resulted in too much unexpected work for me (with now 7 new
employees). But I am getting there.
The only part that still uses the backend, is the appointment calendar. It can
be used as example how to do it.
> As well, looking around the server/ directory only revealed some sql to set
> up the database. Has coding begun on the services broker or any of the
> service providers? What language were these intended to be written in?
Yes. Re service broker have a look at gmPG.py. Written in Python, of course
;-)
> gnumed seems like a very good project, but it looks like it's a long way
> from going live.
That's right
Horst