[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnumed-devel] gnumed architecture
From: |
Horst Herb |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnumed-devel] gnumed architecture |
Date: |
Wed, 4 Jun 2003 23:44:38 +1000 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5 |
On Wed, 4 Jun 2003 23:24, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
> Thanks for supporting my point. At one point we decided
> against using SQLRelay because it does not support (at least I
> can't find it) backend notifications in PostgreSQL. The point
> being that SQLRelay requires client changes (although it does
> come DB-API 2 conformant) and thus cannot just be swapped
> in/out
This misconception stems from the pre-distributed-services era.
If a service needs load balancing, nothing will stop it from using SQL-Relay.
All it needs to do is open a second communication channel to each server for
asynchronous backend notifications, which is simple enough
Horst
Re: [Gnumed-devel] gnumed architecture, Karsten Hilbert, 2003/06/03