[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnumed-devel] re: sourceforge ldap
From: |
Karsten Hilbert |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnumed-devel] re: sourceforge ldap |
Date: |
Fri, 21 May 2004 16:10:20 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.22.1i |
> >>Yes an LDAP-based match provider class needs to be written along
> >>similar
> >>lines to the SQL match providers that we have, if we decide to go
> >>down this path.
> >That sounds like a reasonable first step [but what is the case use
> >scenario]
>
> Maybe the bridge is:
> "when someone is ready to go down this path for an actual
> implementation"
> ...and therefore has a vested interest in trying to help make it happen.
Well, sure, that *is* a "use case".
Karsten
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] re: sourceforge ldap, (continued)
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] re: sourceforge ldap, Karsten Hilbert, 2004/05/23
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] re: sourceforge ldap, Karsten Hilbert, 2004/05/20
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] re: sourceforge ldap, Karsten Hilbert, 2004/05/20
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] re: sourceforge ldap, Ian Haywood, 2004/05/20
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] re: sourceforge ldap, Karsten Hilbert, 2004/05/20
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] re: sourceforge ldap, Ian Haywood, 2004/05/21
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] re: sourceforge ldap, Karsten Hilbert, 2004/05/21
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] re: sourceforge ldap,
Karsten Hilbert <=