gnumed-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnumed-devel] gmClinNarrative: some questions


From: J Busser
Subject: Re: [Gnumed-devel] gmClinNarrative: some questions
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 21:38:29 -0700

On Jul 29, 2004, at 6:31 PM, Ian Haywood wrote:

Firstly "is_aoe" and "is_rfe": what does it mean if these flags are true
for SOAP lines other han Subjective or Assessment respectively.
(i.e how can an Objective comment be a request for encounter?)
Would it not be simpler to have 2 more SOAP categories, say "r"
for where S is RFE and "e" for AOE (where an assessment is an AOE)

Within a few days of your having posted your simple SOAP widget, Karsten proposed that RFE and AOE be added to the widget though did not propose a corresponding adjustment to the backend schema.

His idea might have been that, during parsing,
- if RFE is empty, set is_rfe to TRUE for that episode-encounter's "S" row - if AOE is empty, set is_aoe to TRUE for that episode-encounter's "A" row

but I agree it might be cleaner to house any "RFE" text inside a soap row where soap_cat=="R" and "AOE" into a soap row where soap_cat=="E". Maybe even another character, since the "E" does not nicely convey or remind AOE. Since the AOE is a "special" row we could assign a more "special" character like "X" as in "X marks the spot" or, if the value need not be an alpha character, even "=" (what it "equals") or maybe "!" (denoting the emphasis) ;-) The chosen character may matter little if the user never sees it, but maybe the values will come into view at a later stage.





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]