[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnumed-devel] gmClinNarrative: some questions
From: |
J Busser |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnumed-devel] gmClinNarrative: some questions |
Date: |
Thu, 29 Jul 2004 21:38:29 -0700 |
On Jul 29, 2004, at 6:31 PM, Ian Haywood wrote:
Firstly "is_aoe" and "is_rfe": what does it mean if these flags are
true
for SOAP lines other han Subjective or Assessment respectively.
(i.e how can an Objective comment be a request for encounter?)
Would it not be simpler to have 2 more SOAP categories, say "r"
for where S is RFE and "e" for AOE (where an assessment is an AOE)
Within a few days of your having posted your simple SOAP widget,
Karsten proposed that RFE and AOE be added to the widget though did not
propose a corresponding adjustment to the backend schema.
His idea might have been that, during parsing,
- if RFE is empty, set is_rfe to TRUE for that episode-encounter's "S"
row
- if AOE is empty, set is_aoe to TRUE for that episode-encounter's "A"
row
but I agree it might be cleaner to house any "RFE" text inside a soap
row where soap_cat=="R" and "AOE" into a soap row where soap_cat=="E".
Maybe even another character, since the "E" does not nicely convey or
remind AOE. Since the AOE is a "special" row we could assign a more
"special" character like "X" as in "X marks the spot" or, if the value
need not be an alpha character, even "=" (what it "equals") or maybe
"!" (denoting the emphasis) ;-) The chosen character may matter little
if the user never sees it, but maybe the values will come into view at
a later stage.