[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnumed-devel] GNotary
From: |
Karsten Hilbert |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnumed-devel] GNotary |
Date: |
Tue, 30 Aug 2005 19:15:02 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 08:30:03AM +0800, Syan Tan wrote:
> also , what if clients are allowed to be non-real time , or using a
> store-and-forward to gnotary, where there is an allowable time lapse?
>
> patient X isn't explained certain risks, but as soon as they leave, the
> helpful
> emr pops up a reminder to explain risks, and asks
>
> whether to auto-record the risks have been explained, and the doc, presses the
> yes button quickly, and moves to the next patient,
>
> and the delay of 2 minutes is the difference between a document with and
> without risks explained.
That doesn't make any difference whatsoever.
GNotary is about being able to prove the *integrity* of a
document not the truthfulness of the content.
Karsten
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] GNotary, (continued)
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] GNotary,
Karsten Hilbert <=