[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnumed-devel] GNUmed top level exception handler - language advice

From: J Busser
Subject: Re: [Gnumed-devel] GNUmed top level exception handler - language advice needed
Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 07:47:06 -0700

Sorry for the afterthought but even if the user clicks "Close GNUmed", may there already have been a problem of their data not having gotten, or getting, properly committed?

I am guessing that even GNUmed *could* (normally) detect and report a problem with saving data, this could be impeded by an exception.

Do we therefore think it advisable that, after an exception, the user verified whether their last entry had been properly saved? If not with every exception, then with the unhandled ones?

If so, then maybe after "don't count on it." add one of

Either way, it is advisable to notice if your next (or last) entry appears intact.


If you keep running, it is advisable to watch if your current entry appears intact.

... provided the above does not overly lengthen (vertically) the window

On May 11, 2007, at 4:44 AM, Karsten Hilbert wrote:

On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 01:35:30PM +0200, Karsten Hilbert wrote:

Attached find a screenshot of the exception handler in
action with all suggestions included.
Well ...

GPG key ID E4071346 @
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD  4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346
Gnumed-devel mailing list

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]