Re: [Gnumed-devel] GNUmed top level exception handler - language advice needed

[J Busser]

Sorry for the afterthought but even if the user clicks "Close  
GNUmed", may there already have been a problem of their data not  
having gotten, or getting, properly committed?

I am guessing that even GNUmed *could* (normally) detect and report a  
problem with saving data, this could be impeded by an exception.

Do we therefore think it advisable that, after an exception, the user  
verified whether their last entry had been properly saved? If not  
with every exception, then with the unhandled ones?

If so, then maybe after "don't count on it." add one of

	Either way, it is advisable to notice if your next (or last) entry  
appears intact.

or

	If you keep running, it is advisable to watch if your current entry  
appears intact.

... provided the above does not overly lengthen (vertically) the window

On May 11, 2007, at 4:44 AM, Karsten Hilbert wrote:

> On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 01:35:30PM +0200, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
>
> > Attached find a screenshot of the exception handler in
> > action with all suggestions included.
> Well ...
>
> Karsten
> --
> GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net
> E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD  4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346
> <GNUmed-exception-handler.png>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnumed-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnumed-devel