[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnumed-devel] edifact

From: engelbert . gruber
Subject: Re: [Gnumed-devel] edifact
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 20:11:53 +0100 (CET)

for another project i did edifact im/export in python
but i had the messages as plain text files.

and as poeple are discussing different encryptions it might be better
to separate sender verification from edifact reading

on the other hand if the sender is inside edifact ?

where does what come from and where should it end ?


On Thu, 8 Nov 2007, syan tan wrote:

In Oz, bouncycastle based SMIME with encryption using public keys and
signing with secret keys ( authentication with public keys, and
decryption with secret keys , at receiver end). Some people calling for
gpg as alternative, as requires getting keys and public certificate
from a authority , e.g. government.  secret keys stored as secret key
encrypted files on dongles issued by authority. Practice wide secret
keys used for decryption, a few use personal secret keys for

On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 23:04 +0100, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 07:46:07PM +0100, Helge wrote:

I saw back in 2003 there was some discussion about edifact import. In
Norway most written communication both ways now is electronic (lab, xray,
references), and edifact and XML are preferred formats. Is it possible
today to import/export documents edifact/XML formatted?
No. We haven't hat a use case.

What about PKI?
Exactly what is that they do with PKI ?


Gnumed-devel mailing list

 --- Engelbert Gruber -------+
  SSG Fintl,Gruber,Lassnig  /
  A6170 Zirl   Innweg 5b   /
  Tel. ++43-5238-93535 ---+

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]