[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnumed-devel] terminology question
From: |
Karsten Hilbert |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnumed-devel] terminology question |
Date: |
Sat, 4 Apr 2009 00:38:39 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 02:29:04PM -0700, Jim Busser wrote:
> 2) a sort_value field stored with the Issue, which would default to
> blank but which the user could populate. Any items possessing a value
> (1,2,3) could be sorted at top and anything blank below, in alpha order.
> Even later it would be slick if drag-and-drop would auto-update the
> values contained in the sort_value field.
I feel inclined to support that in 0.5. Whether drag-or-drop
or manually is another matter.
Karsten
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] terminology question, (continued)
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] terminology question, Jim Busser, 2009/04/05
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] terminology question, Karsten Hilbert, 2009/04/05
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] terminology question, Jim Busser, 2009/04/05
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] terminology question, Karsten Hilbert, 2009/04/05
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] terminology question, Karsten Hilbert, 2009/04/05
- Message not available
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] terminology question, Jim Busser, 2009/04/03
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] terminology question,
Karsten Hilbert <=
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] terminology question, Karsten Hilbert, 2009/04/03
Re: [Gnumed-devel] terminology question, Karsten Hilbert, 2009/04/02
Re: [Gnumed-devel] terminology question, Karsten Hilbert, 2009/04/03