[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnumed-devel] address@hidden: openEHR in 2010- where to focus our effor
From: |
Karsten Hilbert |
Subject: |
[Gnumed-devel] address@hidden: openEHR in 2010- where to focus our effort?] |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Jan 2010 20:26:31 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
----- Forwarded message from "Shannon Tony (Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS
Trust)" <address@hidden> -----
> Subject: openEHR in 2010- where to focus our effort?
>
> Dear Colleagues,
>
> As we have now begun 2010 it might be useful to take a bit of stock of where
> we are, where we want to be..
>
> I commented in my last email of 2009 of where I felt progress had been made..
> http://www.openehr.org/mailarchives/openehr-clinical/msg01679.html
> When looking forward this year, there appears a natural focal point of
> Medinfo in September 2010 in Cape Town.
> It appears to be a good place to be exploring openEHR progress together.
>
> With that in mind, last year Tim Cook and Shinji Kobayashi kicked off the
> idea of a "Connectathon" during Medinfo.
> We did some simple work on a example patient journey, as a means of agreeing
> something we want to be able to support.
> It's a story of a patient who needs to attend the ED, the GP and some
> specialty services over his many years as a diabetic...
> http://www.openehr.org/wiki/display/resources/Connect-a-thon+Details
This link is probably worth linking from the wiki.
Karsten
> Its not the perfect journey, but I hope it at least serves as a means of
> debate and discussion.
>
> So rather than outline my own view of what the openEHR clinical & technical
> community might need to do to make the Medinfo Connectathon happen, I'd
> rather a bit of healthy debate please...
> To provoke that debate I'd like to share a variety of questions (with a mix
> of clinical and technical angles) that you might like to pick up and and
> share your thoughts/views on..
>
> ###
>
> Who is interested in being involved in an openEHR showcase from a clinical or
> technical perspective?
>
> Where are we with openEHR archetype development internationally (ref top 10
> archetype work in CKM)?
> Where are the key gaps needed in archetypes to support this patient journey?
> Have you done any work locally that might be useful?
> How could we/should we get more clinical interest in this effort and/or
> clinical approval of these archetypes/templates by professional clinical
> bodies.?
>
> This also stimulates related issues like;
> Are the CKM archetypes begin developed at the right level of
> detail/granularity for this exercise?
> What level of archetype-terminology binding is required to support this
> patient journey?
> Who can help with the terminology binding work needed?
>
> What level of templating would need to be done to make this Connecthon work?
> How is the relationship between archetypes and templates developing from
> where you are ?
> (the technical folk might want to debate slots, specialisation, state of the
> template spec)
>
> How are folk using CKM and/or archetype/template editing tools?
> Can we showcase linkage between CKM and local systems at this event?
> Can we showcase openEHR systems handling changes in archetypes and templates?
>
> What is the state of UI development in openEHR? We need systems with an
> effective UI to engage clinicians at a showcase I believe.
> Who wants to showcase their UI?
> What are the implications if vendors have differing mean of UI representation?
>
> How can we most easily demonstrate the value/benefits of openEHR based
> systems?
>
> ##
>
> I'll have emailed this to both the clinical and technical lists to try to get
> a combined discussion as to these issues going forward...
> (Aware that such a variety of questions might stimulate all sorts of threads,
> I'm happy to kick off now and pull some conclusions together later..)
>
> Many thanks for your views back to the community..
>
> Tony
>
>
> Dr. Tony Shannon
> Consultant in Emergency Medicine, Leeds Teaching Hospitals
> Clinical Lead for Informatics, Leeds Teaching Hospitals
> Chair, Clinical Review Board, openEHR Foundation
> address@hidden +44.789.988.5068
>
> ********************************************************************************************************************
>
> This message may contain confidential information. If you are not the
> intended recipient please inform the
> sender that you have received the message in error before deleting it.
> Please do not disclose, copy or distribute information in this e-mail or take
> any action in reliance on its contents:
> to do so is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
>
> Thank you for your co-operation.
>
> NHSmail is the secure email and directory service available for all NHS staff
> in England and Scotland
> NHSmail is approved for exchanging patient data and other sensitive
> information with NHSmail and GSI recipients
> NHSmail provides an email address for your career in the NHS and can be
> accessed anywhere
> For more information and to find out how you can switch, visit
> www.connectingforhealth.nhs.uk/nhsmail
>
> ********************************************************************************************************************
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> openEHR-technical mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
----- End forwarded message -----
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Gnumed-devel] address@hidden: openEHR in 2010- where to focus our effort?],
Karsten Hilbert <=