Re: [Gnumed-devel] FreeDiams 0.4 -> GNUmed

[Eric MAEKER]

> > > > How about "suspected" allergies ? Should I pass those on to
> > > > FreeDiams as well ?
> > >
> > > This question is still open. Also, it doesn't depend on
> > > FreeDiams explicitely supporting that.
> >
> > I agree it would be useful, for example it may be when coming up  
> > with a possible drug that the doctor asks the patient ... "our  
> > record says while you may not be actually allergic, you had a  
> > problem with this or similar medicine, are you agreeable to try it  
> > (again)?"
>
> Sounds reasonable.
>
> > I am only thinking it would be nice for what is "passed", if  
> > unsupported, to not "break" the passing.
>
> Oh, as long as not explicitely supported it could either:
>
> - pass them as if they were certain
>
> - pass them as a pseudo-allergy "suspected: this, that,
>  those" which will not at all be computable by FreeDiams
>  but would still serve as a reminder to the clinician

The problem is the more data to be managed, the more CPU to be used.  
And for now, with only 4 allergies and 2 intolerances, the GUI is  
dramactically slowing down. I've done one or two adjustement to  
improve this but the problem is still complete.
I'm working on it...
When ready, why not differentiate "certain intolerances" or "suspected  
intolerances", the code is the same (for the drug selector).

> @Eric, BTW: FreeDiams might actually use the "EMR" value (if
> available) - it could adjust the window title to say
> something along the lines "connected to ...".

Yes absolutely I can do this.

> Karsten

Eric