[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Should patients have a "status" ?
From: |
Karsten Hilbert |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Should patients have a "status" ? |
Date: |
Mon, 4 Jul 2011 17:05:31 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 07:18:36PM +1000, Elizabeth Dodd wrote:
> Active vs Inactive as suggested
> as time passes people pass between the categories in both directions
> When sorting out how many diabetics have had a HbA1c done in last 6
> months it is needed to exclude "inactive" or your statistics will be
> really bad
Both methods I suggested (.deleted and tagging) lend
themselves to solving this statistical issue.
There's always room for improvement in most things, I agree.
(Say, in the statistics scenario, one would need to take
into account the *history* of active vs inactive rather than
the current state.)
> and while its on my mind
> do you store previous family name or previous address?
Sure. Any number you wish :-)
Karsten
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ gpg-keyserver.de
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346
- [Gnumed-devel] Should patients have a "status" ?, Jim Busser, 2011/07/03
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Should patients have a "status" ?, Karsten Hilbert, 2011/07/04
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Should patients have a "status" ?, Jim Busser, 2011/07/04
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Should patients have a "status" ?, Karsten Hilbert, 2011/07/04
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Should patients have a "status" ?, Jim Busser, 2011/07/04
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Should patients have a "status" ?, Karsten Hilbert, 2011/07/04
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Should patients have a "status" ?, Jim Busser, 2011/07/04
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Should patients have a "status" ?, Karsten Hilbert, 2011/07/04