[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Overlapping encounters?
From: |
Karsten Hilbert |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Overlapping encounters? |
Date: |
Thu, 24 Nov 2011 13:21:18 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 10:34:34PM +0000, Adrian Midgley wrote:
> I think this is what we would call Episodes of Care, of which more
> than one may be dealt with during one Encounter.
Episodes of Care we already support anyways. They are
orthogonal to the encounter.
It's a good point though - an automatic importer could use a
specifically targeted pseudo-episode "incoming results" to
additionally indicate that no clinician was yet involved in
thinking about those results (at which point they
would/should be repositioned under the relevant encounter -
for which, I agree, better workflow can always be imagined).
> Episodes of care have received considerable attention in the UK and I
> think are more of interest and concern to medical informaticists than
> to jobbing doctors.
>
> THat's becuase infomraticially inclined doctors understand the point
> of it. But it needs to be inconspicuous until needed.
In GNUmed one can write a hook script generating an
unattributed episode named, say, "General Care" and/or even
attach it to a health issue "General Care" which runs
whenever a patient is added and/or activated thereby making
sure said issue/episode auto-exists.
Assuming the doctor would always document her SOAP under
said pseudo-episode GNUmed would auto-open an editor on it
the next time around in the SOAP editor plugin.
Assuming the doctor would never explicitely close it and
would set his auto-close age for old untouched episodes to,
say, "3 years" said episode would always be upfront courtesy
of it being the pretty much only open/active episode/issue.
(Other than that the hook script could always re-open it
upon patient activation if that would be site policy.)
Sounds sufficiently inconspicuous ?
(Even I didn't know GNUmed was that programmable already :-)
To improve that workflow someone might write a Poor Man's
SOAP plugin which
- always only uses that episode
- always only concerns itself with S among SOAP
not bothering the user about that decision
Karsten
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ gpg-keyserver.de
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346