[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnumed-devel] GNUMed SOAP vs SOAPless progress notes
From: |
Karsten Hilbert |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnumed-devel] GNUMed SOAP vs SOAPless progress notes |
Date: |
Thu, 1 Dec 2011 15:52:54 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 12:41:26AM +0000, Jim Busser wrote:
> While making no expectation that it be you who does the coding, does the
> following make sense?
>
> Suppose that one or more users would desire a plug-in exactly like the
> existing Notes plug-in (gmSoapPlugin) *except* that in place of
>
> Subjective
> [free text field]
>
> Objective
> [free text field]
>
> Assessment
> [free text field]
>
> Plan
> [free text field]
>
> they desire
>
> Narrative (soap_cat = NULL)
> [free text field]
>
> 1) does it make sense to develop and separately maintain a whole plugin, when
> every thing else within it would be the same *except* for the above? surely
> that would risk failure of updating, where changes to the original would have
> to be replicated in the alternative version
>
> 2) in trying to 'follow' the code in gmSoapPlugin, I have traced it to
>
> gmSOAPWidgets.py
>
> but there I am stuck. Does it make sense that the Notes plugin 'calls' a
> wxGlade file and that a combination of a GNUmed configuration setting
> together with a 'variant' wxGlade file would provide sane functionality?
This can work, yes.
Karsten
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ gpg-keyserver.de
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] GNUMed SOAP vs SOAPless progress notes,
Karsten Hilbert <=