[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Synopsis (AOE?) attaches to the prior encounter?
From: |
Karsten Hilbert |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Synopsis (AOE?) attaches to the prior encounter? |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Nov 2012 23:20:30 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 08:32:58PM +0000, Jim Busser wrote:
> I have a patient in whom I had previously (on Nov 22) created an
> unattributed, open episode "angina" back 6 days ago, under encounter type
> "review chart"
>
> Episode »Angina« [#183]
> Created during encounter:
> review chart (2012-11-22 18:22 - 18:22) [#718]
> Duration: 0:58 (11/2012 - …)
> Status: active
>
> and when today, I got a call from the GP and I activated
> the patient, GNUmed 1.2.5 autocreated a new encounter in
> which I entered a SOAP note and also, at the bottom of the
> Notes plugin, the
>
> Synopsis
>
> as follows
>
> Angina resolved on atenolol 50/d but intolerant thereof (hr 40/min).
>
> In case it matters, I believe that what I then did,
> without having intended to, was to "Save" just the notelet,
> immediately after which I clicked "Save all" thereby saving
> any additional encounter information.
>
> I now have 4 questions.
>
> 1. Does my above input -- "Angina resolved…" -- populate two values:
>
> - the AOE (as a property of the the Encounter) and
No, not that I remember.
> - the episode (as an Episode synopsis)
Yes.
> but not, in any circumstance, a "Health issue Synopsis"
Correct. It would not auto-populate the health issue
synopsis.
> because even if I would have already promoted the item to a
> health issue, health issue (and past history) item synopses
> should have to cut across sometimes-multiple episodes and
> are separately managed and editable inside the EMR tree's
> second-to-higest node, contextual menu "Health Issue
> Actions"?
Exactly. I'm not sure whether - at the time of promotion -
an episode synopsis will be promoted to the new issue's
synopsis
... goes check ...
No it doesn't. Should it ? I guess it should not.
> 2. When inputting a "new problem" in the SOAP editor --
> the synopsis seems suitably labelled "Episode synopsis".
Initially, yes.
> By contrast, in the case of my episode 'Angina" I am not
> shown "Episode synopsis". I am instead shown "Synopsis
> (November 2012)". What is this intended to help me to grasp?
This shows when the synopsis was last updated :-)
Much like last-affirmed of allergies.
> 3. Why is it that despite that I inputted the synopsis "Angina resolved…"
> today, it shows up in the EMR browser under the encounter from 6 days ago)?
That's the start timestamp (2012-11-22 18:22) of the
encounter within which the episode (containing the synopsis)
was created. It also shows that you last modified the
episode entry on 2012-11-28 11:18 (it doesn't show _what_
thereof you modified:
> .------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> | Happened | Doc | | Narrative
> |------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> | 2012-11-22 | JaBu | … | Encounter: review chart 2012-11-22 18:22 -
> 18:22 (2012-11-22 18:22)
> | | | A | Episode (open): Angina;
> | | | | Angina resolved on atenolol 50/d but
> intolerant thereof (hr 40/min).;
> | | | | (2012-11-28 11:18)
> | 2012-11-28 | JaBu | … | Encounter: phone w/ provider 2012-11-28
> 10:40 - 10:55
> | | | | RFE: MIBI Dec 7, 2012 @ 0715 (2012-11-28
> 11:34)
> | | | S | called by GP (patient in office), reported
> to her absence
> | | | | of angina since beginining atenolol 50mg/d
> ~Nov 9th however has
> | | | | thereafter been tired and sleepy, and had
> increased leg edema, but no
> | | | | nocturnal dyspnea. Pre-existing, early
> evening upright dyspnea between
> | | | | about 7 and 9 pm has since also become more
> prominent. He only once
> | | | | tried 25mg daily but then reverted
> (2012-11-28 11:18)
> | | | O | (per Dr A) Looks ok, no crackles, but is
> bradycardic at 40/min.
> | | | | (2012-11-28 11:18)
> | | | A | Intolerant of atenolol 50mg/d (fatigue and
> brady 40/min).
> | | | | Edema NYD.
> | | | | Upright dyspnea NYD. (2012-11-28 11:18)
> | | | P | Dr A arranging CXR, CBC, lytes, urea,
> creatinine, BNP and pt will see me
> | | | | Mon Dec 3 @ 1pm. Has MRI Dec 7th @ 0715.
> (2012-11-28 11:18)
> | None | JaBu | O | Allergy state: unknown, unasked (2012-11-22
> 18:22)
> `------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
...
> 4. Briefly, it seemed a similar problem affected the EMR tree because when I
> set focus on the Unattributed episode
>
> Angina
>
> what I then saw at right, above the soaplets from my "Progress notes from
> most recent encounter", was the following
>
> Episode »Angina« [#183]
> Created during encounter: review chart (2012-11-22 18:22 - 18:22)
> [#718]
> Duration: 1:28 (11/2012 - …)
> Status: active
>
> Angina resolved on atenolol 50/d but intolerant thereof (hr
> 40/min).
>
> Last worked on: 2012-11-28 10:55
>
> 1 encounter(s) (11/2012 - 11/2012):
> 2012-11-28 10:40 - 10:55 (phone w/ provider): »MIBI Dec 7, 2012 @
> 0715« (RFE)
>
> Progress notes in most recent encounter: <snip>
>
> but I now understand this is *not* "misplaced". That line
> of information ("Angina resolved…") does not belong
> *under* the SOAP note (as it is not an AOE and anyways AOEs
> are not properties of episodes). Rather, that line is placed
> up top as meta-information (the synopsis) for the encounter.
For the _episode_, but, yeah, that's right.
> So can GNUmed--next helpfully reformat this as
>
> Episode »Angina« [#183]
> Created during encounter: review chart (2012-11-22 18:22 - 18:22)
> [#718]
> Duration: 1:28 (11/2012 - …)
> Status: active
> Synopsis: Angina resolved on atenolol 50/d but intolerant thereof (hr
> 40/min).
Done as per screenshot.
Karsten
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ gpg-keyserver.de
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346
screenshot_002.png
Description: PNG image