[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnumed-devel] EMR tree right-pane Synopsis tweak request
From: |
Karsten Hilbert |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnumed-devel] EMR tree right-pane Synopsis tweak request |
Date: |
Sat, 3 Aug 2013 13:18:40 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 11:59:13PM +0000, Jim Busser wrote:
> --> and if I experiment with the status flags and alter the "Health Issue"
> "Angina" to "inactive" the result is
>
> 4 known problems, clinically relevant thereof:
> »Angina« (active)
> »Angina« (inactive)
> »Aortic stenosis, severe« (active)
> »Renal cell Ca, 4+ cm, left, presumptive« (active)
>
> - are there situations where is makes sense for a Health
> Issue to be "inactive" even despite that the episode
> contained therein is "active"?
Not really, I presume ...
> - or should the existence of an active episode within a
> Health Issue always cause the Health issue to be active?
Hm, I guess. I wrote a trigger to do that.
> - when an episode which had been active (of which there
> can only be one at any one time) becomes inactive, should
> that make the Health issue inactive or do we stop short of
> such extensions, and keep them unidirectional (i.e. active
> episode makes inactive health issue --> active but not the
> converse, since a chronic disease might remain "active" even
> despite that the most recent episode had "settled down"?
I agree with not doing the reverse. Also, when the user
manually inactivates an issue I don't think we should be
second guessing and close any open episodes thereof.
Karsten
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ gpg-keyserver.de
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346