[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Placeholder clarifications - nomenclature, syntax and
From: |
Busser, Jim |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Placeholder clarifications - nomenclature, syntax and rules |
Date: |
Mon, 26 Aug 2013 21:49:27 +0000 |
On 2013-08-16, at 2:14 PM, Karsten Hilbert <address@hidden> wrote:
>> In other words, while field_1 can, in some cases, be complete as
>>
>> $<field_1>$
>
> Not anymore.
So effective with client release 1.4, in those cases where it is sufficient to
populate *only* the first field, or part, or clause, of the placeholder, it
will always be necessary to have both pairs of colons ?
$<field_1::::>$
??
-- Jim
- [Gnumed-devel] Placeholder clarifications - nomenclature, syntax and rules, Busser, Jim, 2013/08/16
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Placeholder clarifications - nomenclature, syntax and rules, Karsten Hilbert, 2013/08/16
- [Gnumed-devel] Summary Re: Placeholder clarifications - nomenclature, syntax and rules, Busser, Jim, 2013/08/26
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Placeholder clarifications - nomenclature, syntax and rules,
Busser, Jim <=
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Placeholder clarifications - nomenclature, syntax and rules, Busser, Jim, 2013/08/26