[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Overview plugin report of Activity - "first" activity
From: |
Karsten Hilbert |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Overview plugin report of Activity - "first" activity per patient |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Nov 2013 22:15:43 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 08:58:50PM +0000, Jim Busser wrote:
> Currently, I do not have a test db running.
But you can always create a test patient.
Or (uncomfortably) use the public DB.
> Do we know if GNUmed accepts to add encounters with a date
> earlier than the most recent (current) encounter for the
> active patient?
Sure.
> I am wondering because upon patient creation in GNUmed
> (despite that a praxis could have been providing
> care prior to adopting GNUmed) the Overview plugin
> will report, in the bottom left Activity area:
>
> first: current_date_time, default_encounter_type
>
> where the user gets the impression that this
>
> "first"
>
> might be the first historical activity with this patient when it is really
> just the first (oldest-dated) value in GNUmed.
>
> For any praxis that switched to GNUmed it will give a wrong impression. Is
> there any attraction to word
>
> "first"
>
> to
>
> "first in GNUmed"
Better wording is appreciated, but I'd prefer something shorter.
> or should we encourage a praxis who wishes to maintain an accurate patient
> impression to routinely modify the default encounter
>
> Started current_date_time, default_encounter_type
>
> to
>
> Originally_seen_date, desired_encounter_type
I think no user will find that convenient, not even if
we made that a field (seen_first) in the <new patient>
dialog.
> and can this be equally well achieved by modifying the
> auto-created encounter or by adding an older encounter
> or will this confuse anything in GNUmed?
That'll work just fine.
Karsten
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ gpg-keyserver.de
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346