gnumed-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnumed-devel] query result


From: Karsten Hilbert
Subject: Re: [Gnumed-devel] query result
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 10:21:19 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 04:22:49AM +0000, Jim Busser wrote:

> >> Nevertheless I have eventually been able to identify the
> >> problem: Apparently Vaibhav never ran any of the fixup
> >> scripts against his v18 database. I don't know whether
> >> an easy means to do so has been provided on Windows. The
> >> 18 -> v19 upgrade does, however, run all v18 fixups
> >> against the v18-state database just in case. That way
> >> one more document template sneaked in which would have
> >> been added with previous v18 fixups already.
> 
> I am afraid I do not understand.
> 
> If
> 
>       the 18 -> v19 upgrade "does, however, run all v18 fixups"
> 
> then what is the difference between whether or not any of the 18 fixups had 
> been run (or not) if running the v19 upgrade would run the fixups.
> 
> IOW … why is it believed that the answer to
> 
>       So you are saying that running the fix-up scripts before
>       upgrading would make the check work ?
> 
> is
> 
>       Yes.
> 
> when running the v18 --> 19 upgrade did not fix it?

The sanity checks are run against the original v18 and the
newly created v19 while the fixup scripts are running against
the cloned-to-become-v19-but-still-v18 database before running
the upgrade scripts against the cloned database.

Karsten
-- 
GPG key ID E4071346 @ gpg-keyserver.de
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD  4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]