Re: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problem with +numberWithBool: ?)

[Kazunobu Kuriyama]

Alexander Malmberg wrote:
<snip>

> +BOOL values are normal c truth values. Any non-zero value (i.e. any value
> +not equal to NO) is true. Thus, BOOL values must never be compared against
> +YES since this doesn't correctly handle true values other than YES.
I'd prefer
   Any non-zero value (i.e. any value not equal to NO) is *evaluated* to
   be true if necessary (e.g. evaluation of expressions involving 
relational
   or logical (AND|OR|NEGATION) operators, or conditional ones
   in IF, WHILE, SWITCH, or FOR statements).
to
   Any non-zero value (i.e. any value not equal to NO) is true.

Perhaps, there's room for improving English of the sentences.