Re: Problem with +numberWithBool: ?

[Nicola Pero]

> It isn't an implementation detail since it means that BOOL isn't a true
> boolean type. Compare this with c99's _Bool, which is a true boolean
> type:

It's nice you mention the c99's boolean type; I suppose it would make
sense to try have BOOL as compatible as possible with the c99's bool type,
hoping that at some point they will be merged.

That might be painful, but it looks like a change which is naturally bound
to happen.