|
| From: | Nicola Pero |
| Subject: | Re: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problem with +numberWithBool: ?) |
| Date: | Mon, 2 Feb 2004 19:47:24 +0000 (GMT) |
> I would again like to point out that if the intention was to limit BOOL
> to YES and NO, it would have been defined as
> typedef enum { YES, NO } BOOL;
Wouldn't this have been a waste a space just to just store a YES/NO ?
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |