Archives are refreshed every 30 minutes - for details, please visit the main index.
You can also download the archives in mbox format.

gnustep-dev (date)

[Thread Index][Top][All Lists]

Advanced

[Prev Period]

Last Modified: Sat Feb 28 2004 21:20:57 -0500 Messages in reverse chronological order

[Next Period]

---

• February 28, 2004
  • Re: Bigger change to NSView, Adam Fedor, 21:20
  • Re: Bigger change to NSView, Fred Kiefer, 16:28
  • Re: Bigger change to NSView, Gregory John Casamento, 13:40
  • Bigger change to NSView, Fred Kiefer, 12:23
• February 27, 2004
  • Re: base64 coder/decoder for GNUstep, David Ayers, 04:43
• February 26, 2004
  • Holiday, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 04:18
• February 24, 2004
  • Re: [Fwd: Report: GNUstep on Win32], Fred Kiefer, 19:38
  • [Fwd: Report: GNUstep on Win32], Marc Ordinas i Llopis, 11:09
• February 23, 2004
  • Next release, Adam Fedor, 23:21
• February 19, 2004
  • Medelos de cartas comerciais: http://www.gueb.de/modelosdecartascomerciais, Erica Miranda, 15:13
• February 16, 2004
  • Re: ProjectCenter development plans, Alex Perez, 19:50
• February 12, 2004
  • Cursos em vídeo e áudio marketing: http: //www.gueb.de/produtosinovadores, Paulo Grassi, 20:04
• February 10, 2004
  • Re: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problemwith+numberWithBool:?), Alexander Malmberg, 08:44
  • Re: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problemwith+numberWithBool:?), Nicola Pero, 08:43
  • Re: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problemwith+numberWithBool:?), Alexander Malmberg, 08:14
  • Re: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problemwith+numberWithBool:?), David Ayers, 06:45
  • Re: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problemwith+numberWithBool:?), Kazunobu Kuriyama, 02:21
• February 09, 2004
  • Re: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problemwith+numberWithBool:?), Pascal J . Bourguignon, 21:57
  • Re: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problemwith+numberWithBool:?), Kazunobu Kuriyama, 21:00
  • Re: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problemwith+numberWithBool:?), David Ayers, 15:44
  • Re: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problemwith+numberWithBool:?), Pascal J . Bourguignon, 12:36
  • Re: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problemwith+numberWithBool:?), Richard Frith-Macdonald, 05:59
  • Re: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problemwith+numberWithBool:?), David Ayers, 05:30
  • Re: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problemwith+numberWithBool:?), Pascal J . Bourguignon, 03:13
  • Re: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problemwith+numberWithBool:?), Kazunobu Kuriyama, 02:48
• February 08, 2004
  • Re: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problemwith+numberWithBool:?), Kazunobu Kuriyama, 19:00
  • Re: Question on GSDrawingFunctions, Fred Kiefer, 08:18
• February 07, 2004
  • Re: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problemwith+numberWithBool:?), Nicola Pero, 21:38
  • Re: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problemwith+numberWithBool:?), Pascal J . Bourguignon, 20:39
  • Re: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problemwith+numberWithBool:?), David Ayers, 18:03
  • Re: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problemwith+numberWithBool:?), Kazunobu Kuriyama, 17:08
  • Re: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problemwith+numberWithBool:?), David Ayers, 06:39
  • Re[2]: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problemwith+numberWithBool:?), Manuel Guesdon, 06:07
  • Re: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problemwith+numberWithBool:?), David Ayers, 05:27
  • Re: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problemwith+numberWithBool:?), Richard Frith-Macdonald, 01:14
• February 06, 2004
  • Re: NSURL path question, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 13:24
  • NSURL path question, Stefan Urbanek, 11:55
• February 05, 2004
  • RE: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problemwith+numberWithBool:?), Adam Fedor, 18:13
  • [PATCH] NSButtonCell, Quentin Mathé, 10:03
• February 04, 2004
  • [Fwd: Re: Cocoa/Windows parallel dvlpmt], Fred Kiefer, 19:33
  • Re: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problemwith+numberWithBool:?), David Ayers, 14:04
  • Re: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problemwith+numberWithBool:?), Nicola Pero, 12:23
  • Re: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problemwith+numberWithBool:?), Alexander Malmberg, 03:39
• February 03, 2004
  • Re: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problemwith+numberWithBool:?), Kazunobu Kuriyama, 18:28
  • Re: [PATCH] Framework shlib versioning, Jeff Teunissen, 14:57
  • Re[2]: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problemwith+numberWithBool:?), Manuel Guesdon, 14:22
  • Re: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problemwith+numberWithBool:?), Alexander Malmberg, 11:23
  • Re: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problemwith+numberWithBool:?), Richard Frith-Macdonald, 11:12
  • Re: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problem with +numberWithBool:?), Alexander Malmberg, 11:08
  • Re: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problemwith+numberWithBool:?), Alexander Malmberg, 10:41
  • Re: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problemwith+numberWithBool:?), Richard Frith-Macdonald, 09:55
  • Re: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problemwith+numberWithBool:?), David Ayers, 08:47
  • Re: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problem with+numberWithBool: ?), David Ayers, 06:52
  • Re: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problem with+numberWithBool: ?), Philippe C . D . Robert, 03:10
  • Re: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problem with +numberWithBool: ?), Pascal J . Bourguignon, 00:21
  • Re: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problem with +numberWithBool: ?), Pascal J . Bourguignon, 00:13
• February 02, 2004
  • Re: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problemwith+numberWithBool:?), Nicola Pero, 20:42
  • Re: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problem with +numberWithBool: ?), Helge Hess, 19:45
  • Re: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problem with+numberWithBool: ?), Helge Hess, 19:28
  • Re: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problem with +numberWithBool: ?), Helge Hess, 19:22
  • Re: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problemwith+numberWithBool:?), Alexander Malmberg, 19:03
  • Re: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problem with +numberWithBool: ?), Pascal J . Bourguignon, 18:30
  • Re: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problem with +numberWithBool: ?), Pascal J . Bourguignon, 18:19
  • Re: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problem with+numberWithBool:?), Nicola Pero, 18:16
  • Re: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problem with+numberWithBool:?), Alexander Malmberg, 17:04
  • Re: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problem with+numberWithBool: ?), Leigh Smith, 17:03
  • Re: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problem with+numberWithBool: ?), Philippe C . D . Robert, 16:22
  • Re: Re[2]: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problem with +numberWithBool: ?), Pascal J . Bourguignon, 15:57
  • Re: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problem with +numberWithBool: ?), Pascal J . Bourguignon, 15:50
  • Re: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problem with +numberWithBool: ?), Richard Frith-Macdonald, 14:46
  • Re: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problem with +numberWithBool: ?), Nicola Pero, 14:45
  • Re: [PATCH] Framework shlib versioning, Nicola Pero, 14:13
  • Re: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problem with +numberWithBool: ?), Helge Hess, 14:03
  • Re: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problem with+numberWithBool: ?), Alexander Malmberg, 13:18
  • Re: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problem with+numberWithBool:?), Alexander Malmberg, 13:14
  • Re: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problem with+numberWithBool: ?), Alexander Malmberg, 13:08
  • Re: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problem with+numberWithBool: ?), David Ayers, 11:39
  • Re: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problem with +numberWithBool: ?), Richard Frith-Macdonald, 09:27
  • Re: Question on GSDrawingFunctions, Jeff Teunissen, 09:13
  • Re: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problem with +numberWithBool: ?), David Ayers, 08:50
  • Re: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problem with +numberWithBool: ?), Richard Frith-Macdonald, 08:38
  • Re: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problem with +numberWithBool: ?), David Ayers, 08:18
  • Re: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problem with +numberWithBool: ?), David Ayers, 07:19
  • Re: Re[2]: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problem with +numberWithBool: ?), Marco Scheurer, 06:25
  • Re: Re[2]: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problem with +numberWithBool: ?), Helge Hess, 06:07
  • Re: Question on GSDrawingFunctions, Fred Kiefer, 05:54
  • Re: Re[2]: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problem with +numberWithBool: ?), Nicola Pero, 01:16
  • Re: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problem with +numberWithBool: ?), Nicola Pero, 00:30
  • Re: Re[2]: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problem with +numberWithBool: ?), Leigh Smith, 00:02
• February 01, 2004
  • Re: Question on GSDrawingFunctions, Adam Fedor, 23:40
  • Cursos em vídeo e áudio marketing http://ww w.mercadinhovirtual.h2c.net, Erica Oliveira, 21:43
  • Re: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problem with +numberWithBool: ?), Helge Hess, 20:32
  • Re: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problem with +numberWithBool: ?), Helge Hess, 20:26
  • Re: Re[2]: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problem with +numberWithBool: ?), Helge Hess, 20:23
  • Re: Re[2]: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problem with +numberWithBool: ?), Helge Hess, 20:19
  • Re: Re[2]: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problem with +numberWithBool: ?), Helge Hess, 20:06
  • Re: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problem with+numberWithBool: ?), Helge Hess, 20:02
  • Re: Question on GSDrawingFunctions, Fred Kiefer, 06:34
  • Re: Question on GSDrawingFunctions, Jeff Teunissen, 05:22
  • Re: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problem with+numberWithBool: ?), Kazunobu Kuriyama, 04:11
  • Re: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problem with +numberWithBool: ?), Richard Frith-Macdonald, 02:14
  • Re: [RFA]: BOOL coding standards (Was: Problem with+numberWithBool: ?), Richard Frith-Macdonald, 01:50

---

[Prev Period]

[Next Period]

---

Mail converted by MHonArc