gnustep-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RFC: Rewriting of the GNUstep User FAQ, specifically re: Frameworks


From: Gregory John Casamento
Subject: Re: [RFC: Rewriting of the GNUstep User FAQ, specifically re: Frameworks]
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 05:51:30 -0700 (PDT)

Guys,

--- Sheldon Gill <address@hidden> wrote:
> Alex Perez wrote:
> > Folks,
> > 
> > Since people (see http://osnews.com/comment.php?news_id=10182&limit=no 
> > )are actually reading the GNUstep User FAQ  (see 
> > http://www.gnustep.org/resources/documentation/User/GNUstep/userfaq_1.html 
> >  ), and the information in it regarding Frameworks is IMHO grossly out 
> > of date, I'd like to propose that it be revised to reflect the current 
> > state of Frameworks and also the fact that our pseudo-frameworks now 
> > work under windows, as well as describe what is required for "true" 
> > framework support (eg, linker and compiler support, binary format 
> > enhancement to ELF, etc) and perhaps even mention that Matt Rice has 
> > done some work towards this goal and to contact him if anyone is 
> > interested in it.
> > 
> > What do you think?
> 
> I think it is a good idea but that work on it should be held off for a 
> little while. GNUstep is about to enter an 'unstable' cycle while 
> important changes are made. This is the time when 
> binary-incompatibilities are being introduced.
> 
> Thus, I believe any current update on the faq will need updating again 
> in the near future. If someone feels like doing it both times thats 
> fine. Otherwise, perhaps a note to the effect:
> This FAQ is out of date. New FAQ will be issued in ?July?
> 
> or something like that.

Why don't we move the FAQ to the wiki??

GJC


Gregory John Casamento 
-- CEO/President Open Logic Corp. (A MD Corp.)
## Maintainer of Gorm (IB Equiv.) for GNUstep.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]