[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFC: Rewriting of the GNUstep User FAQ, specifically re: Frameworks
From: |
Gregory John Casamento |
Subject: |
Re: [RFC: Rewriting of the GNUstep User FAQ, specifically re: Frameworks] |
Date: |
Tue, 5 Apr 2005 05:51:30 -0700 (PDT) |
Guys,
--- Sheldon Gill <address@hidden> wrote:
> Alex Perez wrote:
> > Folks,
> >
> > Since people (see http://osnews.com/comment.php?news_id=10182&limit=no
> > )are actually reading the GNUstep User FAQ (see
> > http://www.gnustep.org/resources/documentation/User/GNUstep/userfaq_1.html
> > ), and the information in it regarding Frameworks is IMHO grossly out
> > of date, I'd like to propose that it be revised to reflect the current
> > state of Frameworks and also the fact that our pseudo-frameworks now
> > work under windows, as well as describe what is required for "true"
> > framework support (eg, linker and compiler support, binary format
> > enhancement to ELF, etc) and perhaps even mention that Matt Rice has
> > done some work towards this goal and to contact him if anyone is
> > interested in it.
> >
> > What do you think?
>
> I think it is a good idea but that work on it should be held off for a
> little while. GNUstep is about to enter an 'unstable' cycle while
> important changes are made. This is the time when
> binary-incompatibilities are being introduced.
>
> Thus, I believe any current update on the faq will need updating again
> in the near future. If someone feels like doing it both times thats
> fine. Otherwise, perhaps a note to the effect:
> This FAQ is out of date. New FAQ will be issued in ?July?
>
> or something like that.
Why don't we move the FAQ to the wiki??
GJC
Gregory John Casamento
-- CEO/President Open Logic Corp. (A MD Corp.)
## Maintainer of Gorm (IB Equiv.) for GNUstep.