Re: Graceful termination again

[Matt Rice]

--- Richard Frith-Macdonald <address@hidden>
wrote:
<snip>

> If we want to put the functionality into an existing
> daemon, I think  
> gpbs would be the best option, as it is part of the
> gui/back  
> libraries (ie related to applications) while gdnc
> provides a service  
> for the base library.
> 
> However, if we want to provide a reference
> implementation that  
> developers of workspace managers can look at, I
> think a standalone  
> process would be better than attaching the
> functionality to an  
> existing daemon...

fwiw i sent such a daemon a while ago...

http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/discuss-gnustep/2003-05/msg00269.html

thread continues here...
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnustep/2003-06/msg00030.html

> and if we don't want to do that,
> my preference  
> would be not to bother at all ... just use an
> on-disk database of   
> the information we need, and modify GWorkspace as
> our standard  
> workspace manager.


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com