gnustep-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GNUstep Testfarm Results


From: Gregory John Casamento
Subject: Re: GNUstep Testfarm Results
Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 10:01:06 -0800 (PST)

Shouldn't the compile farm remove previous installations so that chicken-and-egg dependencies can be detected?
 
Gregory Casamento -- Principal Consultant - OLC, Inc
# GNUstep Chief Maintainer



From: Adam Fedor <address@hidden>
To: Developer GNUstep <address@hidden>
Sent: Sunday, December 7, 2008 12:56:02 PM
Subject: Re: GNUstep Testfarm Results


On Dec 7, 2008, at 10:57 AM, Fred Kiefer wrote:
>>
>> Fail Compile i386-unknown-freebsd6.4 Sun Dec  7 15:38:36 CST 2008
>
> To me the check problem reported here look like the are caused by the
> recent SYSTEM install change. We could either update the build script to
> install into SYSTEM again or change the tests.
>
>> Success Compile sparc-sun-solaris2.7 Sun Dec  7 01:41:22 EST 2008
>> Success Compile x86_64-unknown-netbsd4.0 Sun Dec  7 03:55:44 CET 2008
>
> Why isn't the same happening here?
>

Probably due to a previous install.  I should probably improve that test.



_______________________________________________
Gnustep-dev mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]