gnustep-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Live Splitview patch


From: Gregory Casamento
Subject: Re: Live Splitview patch
Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 11:09:42 -0400

I really believe we should go ahead and put this change in and see
what the actual impact on some systems is before dismissing it out of
hand.  If it becomes an efficiency issue we can make it conditional on
some machines or make it a default.

On Thursday, May 14, 2009, David Chisnall <address@hidden> wrote:
> Running this in my VM, with remote X11, there is slight lag (as I'd expect 
> from remote X11) and resizing the splitview makes my CPU usage jump to a 
> massive 1.9%.
>
> I realise that this is a massive overhead, and suggest that we consider very 
> carefully whether it is worth the extra cost.
>
> David
>
> On 14 May 2009, at 21:49, Riccardo Mottola wrote:
>
>
> Hmm,
>
> I prefer not to have them live... it disturbs me.
> Besides, 1ghz is slow for a desktop perhaps, but for some netbook it is not.
>
> --Riccardo
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm ready to commit this patch, but I wanted to give the heads up
>
> before...
>
> This basically remove the reverse splitview bar we draw to instead do
> live resizing.
> It's reasonably fast, tested on slow-ish machines (~1ghz x86 & ppc),
> and makes things much nicer from a UI point of view.
> Comments before I submit ? :)
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnustep-dev mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnustep-dev mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
>




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]