[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Jenkins build is back to normal : gnustep #12
From: |
Quentin Mathé |
Subject: |
Re: Jenkins build is back to normal : gnustep #12 |
Date: |
Sat, 31 Mar 2012 17:43:38 +0200 |
Hi Gregory,
Why not just create a new list rather than using gnustep-dev ?
Cheers,
Quentin.
Le 31 mars 2012 à 17:12, Gregory Casamento a écrit :
> I, honestly, would like it reported to the list so that people OTHER
> than the person who broke it can act on it.
>
> All too often people will ignore the email. If it is sent to the
> list, the maintainers as well as the person who broke it will know
> about it.
>
> Alternatively I could, instead of putting it to the list, copy myself
> and the other maintainers (Fred, Richard, David, etc) so that they can
> see when and if the build is broken. But I would rather not spam
> personal emails in that way.
>
> Later, GC
>
> On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Ivan Vučica <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Sending a mail to the person who broke the build really is the best way to
>> go.
>>
>> But please do consider opening at least the logs for viewing purposes, so
>> the person who broke the thing (and other interested parties) can see what
>> went wrong. :-)
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 16:48, Gregory Casamento <address@hidden>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> David,
>>>
>>> If you're asking if I can make Jenkins available on a website which is
>>> accessible to the outside world, I'm not sure if I should until I
>>> configure the logins so that not just everyone can administer it.
>>>
>>> Once I have that set up I will make this public. Also, I will remove
>>> address@hidden, if you guys would like me to make it just send to
>>> the people who broke the build, that's fine. I did a test with my
>>> own gnu address and it bounced, so I will need to manually configure
>>> the addresses in Jenkins for each of us.
>>>
>>> Thanks, GC
>>>
>>> On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 9:50 AM, David Chisnall <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>> On 31 Mar 2012, at 14:48, address@hidden wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> See <http://192.168.1.6:8080/job/gnustep/12/>
>>>>
>>>> If you're going to spam the list with these things, could you at least
>>>> use a publicly routable address?
>>>>
>>>> David
>>>>
>>>> -- Sent from my Difference Engine
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Gregory Casamento
>>> Open Logic Corporation, Principal Consultant
>>> yahoo/skype: greg_casamento, aol: gjcasa
>>> (240)274-9630 (Cell)
>>> http://www.gnustep.org
>>> http://heronsperch.blogspot.com
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Gnustep-dev mailing list
>>> address@hidden
>>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ivan Vučica - address@hidden
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Gregory Casamento
> Open Logic Corporation, Principal Consultant
> yahoo/skype: greg_casamento, aol: gjcasa
> (240)274-9630 (Cell)
> http://www.gnustep.org
> http://heronsperch.blogspot.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnustep-dev mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
- Jenkins build is back to normal : gnustep #12, greg . casamento, 2012/03/31
- Re: Jenkins build is back to normal : gnustep #12, David Chisnall, 2012/03/31
- Re: Jenkins build is back to normal : gnustep #12, Gregory Casamento, 2012/03/31
- Re: Jenkins build is back to normal : gnustep #12, Ivan Vučica, 2012/03/31
- Re: Jenkins build is back to normal : gnustep #12, Gregory Casamento, 2012/03/31
- Re: Jenkins build is back to normal : gnustep #12,
Quentin Mathé <=
- Re: Jenkins build is back to normal : gnustep #12, Ivan Vučica, 2012/03/31
- Message not available
- Re: Jenkins build is back to normal : gnustep #12, Gregory Casamento, 2012/03/31
- Jenkins build is back to normal : gnustep #12, Gregory Casamento, 2012/03/31