[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gomp-discuss] fortran c/c++
From: |
Biagio Lucini |
Subject: |
Re: [Gomp-discuss] fortran c/c++ |
Date: |
Wed, 18 Dec 2002 09:24:47 +0000 (GMT) |
On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, Lars Segerlund wrote:
>
> I am very interested in starting of on 3DNow / MMx / EMMX
> instructions, since this would be a nice warmup working with the
> backend, and there is some previous work on backends ( GLP'ed ).
>
What do you refer to exactly? Some libraries for direct access of those
instructions, as implemented by Intel in their compilers? Or a smarter
optimisation enabling advanced use of instruction sets?
> So in order to attract competent developers, ( not scare them away ),
> I think dokumentation would be a start, perhaps even the policy ( ouch !
> ) of 'nothing goes in if it's not documented' ?
>
Maybe that's too strict. I'll be pretty happy with a clear design, even if
it must be updated often, as we lear better ways of doing things and
doxygen-generated documentation 'till the code proves to be stable.
Biagio