[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Gomp-discuss] parallell vs. distributed
From: |
Scott Robert Ladd |
Subject: |
RE: [Gomp-discuss] parallell vs. distributed |
Date: |
Tue, 4 Feb 2003 12:37:49 -0500 |
Steven Bosscher wrote:
> Pedantic: SGI Altix is *not* SMP ("symmetric multi processor"). Instead
> it's a NUMA machine (Cray NUMAflex architecture on top of Intel Itanium)
> :-P
Grumble, grumble... that's why I had "SMP Supercomputer" in quotes. I
thought we already has enough acronyms in play! ;)
> I'd expect that NUMA and OpenMP don't go together very well unless you
> can do some kind of decomposition of the problem. IIRC that's BLOCK and
> DISTRIBUTE in High Performance Fortran[1]. Hard stuff.
SGI's literature for the Altix advertises using both OpenMP and MPI for
parallel development. If you make a Google search for "OpenMP" and "NUMA",
you'll see a lot of papers discussing this very issue.
..Scott
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] sentinels, (continued)