Re: [Gomp-discuss] Open64's implementation of OpenMP

[Diego Novillo]

On Tue, 04 Feb 2003, Pop Sébastian wrote:

> Diego, could we keep patches for OMP in tree-ssa?
> 
Yes, but I'd like to avoid doing it directly on the branch.  I've
got an alternate idea.  Let's create a sub-branch of tree-ssa for
doing all our OMP hackery.  Two reasons:

- We will be doing changes to files in the front end.  I'd rather
  not pollute the branch itself because we will be looking at
  merging the branch in a few months.

- Changes for OMP can go through a looser review process.  If we
  break bootstraps on the OMP sub-branch, we won't care too much
  at first.  OTOH, tree-ssa is under stricter rules.

I volunteer to keep both branches in sync.  I can create a
sub-branch for OMP whenever you guys want to start hacking the
front end.

I also volunteer to do all the middle-end stuff.  I don't think I
want to deal with all the front end bits.

Thoughts?


Diego.