[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gomp-discuss] Open64's implementation of OpenMP
From: |
Steven Bosscher |
Subject: |
Re: [Gomp-discuss] Open64's implementation of OpenMP |
Date: |
04 Feb 2003 22:23:20 +0100 |
Op di 04-02-2003, om 19:36 schreef Diego Novillo:
> On Tue, 04 Feb 2003, Pop Sébastian wrote:
>
> > Once we have all this I think we could merge with tree-ssa, allowing
> > analyzers to emit nodes with parallel semantics based either on the
> > OMP_PRAGMA nodes, or on their results.
> >
> Well, you don't need to merge into tree-ssa. I will be syncing
> the omp branch with tree-ssa on a regular basis. So omp-branch
> will always be the latest tree-ssa plus OMP changes.
>
> Once tree-ssa is merged into mainline, we make omp-branch a
> branch of mainline.
Sounds good enough.
Like you said, the initial change sets will be relatively small. There
will probably a new file c-openmp.c (I'm working on that right now), and
there would be some small modifications to tree.{def,h,c?} and
c-simplify.c.
Invasive enough to not put it in the tree-ssa branch for now, simple
enough to allow one branch be merged into the other without too much
effort.
Greetz
Steven
- [Gomp-discuss] Open64's implementation of OpenMP, Pop Sébastian, 2003/02/03
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] Open64's implementation of OpenMP, Diego Novillo, 2003/02/03
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] Open64's implementation of OpenMP, Biagio Lucini, 2003/02/04
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] Open64's implementation of OpenMP, Diego Novillo, 2003/02/04
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] Open64's implementation of OpenMP, Steven Bosscher, 2003/02/04
- [Gomp-discuss] "#pragma omp" and GCC, Steven Bosscher, 2003/02/04
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] "#pragma omp" and GCC, Biagio Lucini, 2003/02/05
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] "#pragma omp" and GCC, Steven Bosscher, 2003/02/05
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] "#pragma omp" and GCC, Lars Segerlund, 2003/02/05