|
From: | Lars Segerlund |
Subject: | Re: [Gomp-discuss] Somethings to think about .... |
Date: | Mon, 10 Mar 2003 16:03:01 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i586; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021226 Debian/1.2.1-9 |
The lib it is then. / Lars. Biagio Lucini wrote:
On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, Lars Segerlund wrote:
[snip]
I didn't mean linux specific, but if hardware support or OS support is present it might make a big difference when it comes to overhead, and thus it would be nice if we tried to make it easy to allow modification of the library to support hardware dependent features. Look at the support for the C runtime lib, ( builtins ? ), this would be the fastest.Though Linux is the most probable host where people may want to run these things, we don't want to target just Linux, do we? I think we should stick with the POSIX compliance (or larger, if somebody has some idea) of gcc.
Still the first thing to do is to get openMP running with a threading library, and perhaps ( if smp safe ) a semaphore library.
[snip] ( I agree with the rest ).
Cheers Biagio _______________________________________________ Gomp-discuss mailing list address@hidden http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gomp-discuss
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |