[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gomp-discuss] Somethings to think about ....
From: |
Biagio Lucini |
Subject: |
Re: [Gomp-discuss] Somethings to think about .... |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Mar 2003 11:03:40 +0000 (GMT) |
On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, [iso-8859-1] Pop S?bastian wrote:
> I have seen one and it's becoming a standard!
> http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/standards/ecma-335.htm
>
[...]
>
> Well, sorry it's a bit off topic on this mailing list, but nevertheless since
> the subject on IR come up, this shows that there are standards that exist in
> intermediate representations that we will have to consider before implementing
> the GENERIC bytes on concurrency.
>
I think that it is in our interest to build all the infrastructures we
need for gomp. So I don't regard this as an off-topic. Moreover, if you
guys think that we don't have the needed prerequisites in the gcc for
parallelisation, it would be sensible to add them first.
Cheers
Biagio
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] CIL representation ..., (continued)
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] CIL representation ..., Lars Segerlund, 2003/03/12
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] CIL representation ..., Biagio Lucini, 2003/03/12
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] CIL representation ..., Steven Bosscher, 2003/03/12
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] CIL representation ..., Biagio Lucini, 2003/03/12
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] CIL representation ..., Diego Novillo, 2003/03/12
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] CIL representation ..., Lars Segerlund, 2003/03/12
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] CIL representation ..., Diego Novillo, 2003/03/12
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] CIL representation ..., Pop Sébastian, 2003/03/12
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] Somethings to think about ....,
Biagio Lucini <=
Re: [Gomp-discuss] Somethings to think about ...., Biagio Lucini, 2003/03/10
Re: [Gomp-discuss] Somethings to think about ...., Lars Segerlund, 2003/03/10