Re: [Gomp-discuss] libgomp

[Lars Segerlund]

 Hi,

  First it all looks ok by me, perhaps were still missing some documentation, ( 
specs and such in the doc katalog ).

  I don't understand what the inactive part means, surely were not inactive ? 
I'm busy with some work on gfortran, ( and learning some stuff that we will 
need for gomp ).

  Jacobs parser would be miracolous to have ported, any stuff that churns along 
is work done, ( I must admit that I haven't given it a good enough look yet due 
to time limitations ).

  I finally think were on the verge of starting off :-) ...

 / Lars Segerlund.

On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 22:18:56 +0200
Biagio Lucini <address@hidden> wrote:

> The package I would propose for replacing the current CVS is at
> 
> http://www.phys.ethz.ch/~lucini/GOMP
> 
> This is essentially the work of Scott, Lars and Jacob, with a couple of 
> trivial fixes that makes it to compile on my system. Try it on yours, and if 
> it works I suggest we have a fresh start in our CVS by importing the tree as
> the libgomp module.   
> 
> Also, I have seen that the gomp-branch is inactive, again. Why? Is there some 
> automatic rule that put in that state a dormant branch? or was it a choice?
> Too bad, because I was going to port Jacob's parser to the branch. The goal 
> is 
> to have a fully working albeit useless OpenMP environment by being able to 
> build the libs and parse the code.
> 
> Thanks
> Biagio
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gomp-discuss mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gomp-discuss