|
From: | Scott Robert Ladd |
Subject: | Re: [Gomp-discuss] Release candidate |
Date: | Tue, 02 Nov 2004 08:20:55 -0500 |
User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (X11/20041029) |
Jacob Weismann Poulsen wrote:
2) As to the content of libgomp I made a few early experimentsthat wasn't meant to make its way to the official tree. The reason is simply that I didn't really think about the structuresnor the implementation and as Scott has said on several occasions(and I think that we all agree on this), we better base the implementation on some kind of design document.
I'll have a requirements document on the list by tonight, if Florida doesn't erupt into total chaos over the election. ;)
We've had several design documents over the course of time. I'm looking at what people proposed, and I've immersed myself in the code generation side of GCC (hunting bugs does wonders for understanding the intricacies of the compiler!) I'm going to toss a preliminary document out for discussion early next week, and hope to have it "done" by mid-month.
PS! As to the copyright stuff, I have finally received the signed letter from FSF and not just the email confirmation that I forwardedto Biagio and Diego last week.
Good! The more the merrier. -- Scott Robert Ladd site: http://www.coyotegulch.com blog: http://chaoticcoyote.blogspot.com
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |