[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gpsd-dev] regression test puzling non-failure which should probably
From: |
Hal Murray |
Subject: |
Re: [gpsd-dev] regression test puzling non-failure which should probably fail |
Date: |
Fri, 30 Jan 2015 14:30:36 -0800 |
address@hidden said:
>> Isn't there a way of asking the system to pick an unused port
>> number and then getting it to tell you the one it assigned?
> If there is, I don't know of it.
If you specify a port number of 0, it assigns one for you.
>From the man page for bind:
EADDRINUSE
(Internet domain sockets) The port number was specified as zero
in the socket address structure, but, upon attempting to bind to
an ephemeral port, it was determined that all port numbers in
the ephemeral port range are currently in use. See the
discusâ
sion of /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_local_port_range ip(7).
>From the man page for ip:
When listen(2) is called on an
unbound socket, the socket is automatically bound to a random free port
with the local address set to INADDR_ANY.
I think getsockname can be used to retrieve the local address.
-------
>From the NetBSD man page for getsockname:
Common uses of this function are as follows:
o When bind(2) is called with a port number of 0 (indicating the kernel
should pick an ephemeral port) getsockname() is used to retrieve the
kernel-assigned port number.
--
These are my opinions. I hate spam.
- [gpsd-dev] regression test puzling non-failure which should probably fail, Greg Troxel, 2015/01/29
- Re: [gpsd-dev] regression test puzling non-failure which should probably fail, Greg Troxel, 2015/01/29
- Re: [gpsd-dev] regression test puzling non-failure which should probably fail, Hal Murray, 2015/01/29
- Re: [gpsd-dev] regression test puzling non-failure which should probably fail, Eric S. Raymond, 2015/01/29
- Re: [gpsd-dev] regression test puzling non-failure which should probably fail, Greg Troxel, 2015/01/30
- Re: [gpsd-dev] regression test puzling non-failure which should probably fail, Eric S. Raymond, 2015/01/30
- Re: [gpsd-dev] regression test puzling non-failure which should probably fail, Greg Troxel, 2015/01/30
- Re: [gpsd-dev] regression test puzling non-failure which should probably fail, Eric S. Raymond, 2015/01/30
- Re: [gpsd-dev] regression test puzling non-failure which should probably fail, Hal Murray, 2015/01/30
- Re: [gpsd-dev] regression test puzling non-failure which should probably fail, Eric S. Raymond, 2015/01/30
- Re: [gpsd-dev] regression test puzling non-failure which should probably fail,
Hal Murray <=
- Re: [gpsd-dev] regression test puzling non-failure which should probably fail, Eric S. Raymond, 2015/01/31