[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gpsd-dev] RC for DRIFT message
From: |
Eric S. Raymond |
Subject: |
Re: [gpsd-dev] RC for DRIFT message |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Feb 2015 00:13:04 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
Greg Troxel <address@hidden>:
> "drift" implies frequency error. This is a phase error, or an offset.
> So call it "clockoffset" or something.
TOS, I think.
> > Which do you guys actually want? I would favor the second - it fits
> > into the existing logic better - but either will be relatively easy.
>
> I don't think it matters, as long as it's close enough to when it was
> measured to not cause trouble. The output should contain
>
> system clock at time of meaurements
> gps time - system clock (at above time)
That's what it'll be.
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Re: [gpsd-dev] RC for DRIFT message, (continued)
- Re: [gpsd-dev] RC for DRIFT message, Eric S. Raymond, 2015/02/23
- Re: [gpsd-dev] RC for DRIFT message, Hal Murray, 2015/02/23
- Re: [gpsd-dev] RC for DRIFT message, Eric S. Raymond, 2015/02/23
- Re: [gpsd-dev] RC for DRIFT message, Hal Murray, 2015/02/24
- Re: [gpsd-dev] RC for DRIFT message, Eric S. Raymond, 2015/02/24
- Re: [gpsd-dev] RC for DRIFT message, Hal Murray, 2015/02/25
- Re: [gpsd-dev] RC for DRIFT message, Gary E. Miller, 2015/02/25
- Re: [gpsd-dev] RC for DRIFT message, Eric S. Raymond, 2015/02/26
- Re: [gpsd-dev] RC for DRIFT message, Gary E. Miller, 2015/02/23
Re: [gpsd-dev] RC for DRIFT message, Greg Troxel, 2015/02/22
- Re: [gpsd-dev] RC for DRIFT message,
Eric S. Raymond <=