[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] nop request
From: |
T. Kurt Bond |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] nop request |
Date: |
Tue, 5 Sep 2000 10:43:02 -0400 (EDT) |
Werner LEMBERG writes:
>
> > So, while I can see the point of Werner's proposal, I think it would
> > be a very good idea to call it something else. Maybe ".pad"? I don't
> > have a clearly good suggestion for the name.
>
> What about `.nor' (no-operation request)? Or just using a symbol,
> e.g. `.!' or `."'?
Would `.always' or `.text' be clearer?
(Although I'm not really certain this needs to be in groff itself.)
--
T. Kurt Bond, address@hidden
- Re: [Groff] nop request, (continued)
RE: [Groff] nop request, Ted Harding, 2000/09/04
Re: [Groff] nop request, Steve Izma, 2000/09/05
- Re: [Groff] nop request, Werner LEMBERG, 2000/09/09
- Re: [Groff] nop request, Ralph Corderoy, 2000/09/12
- Re: [Groff] nop request, Werner LEMBERG, 2000/09/12
- Re: [Groff] nop request, Ralph Corderoy, 2000/09/15
- Re: [Groff] nop request, Werner LEMBERG, 2000/09/18
- Re: [Groff] nop request, Ralph Corderoy, 2000/09/18
- Re: [Groff] nop request, Werner LEMBERG, 2000/09/18
- Re: [Groff] nop request, Ralph Corderoy, 2000/09/20